Having been bombarded with the ads for Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs all year, I think it's finally getting to me. The film looks less than stellar in my opinion, and there are some strange things going on visually. Overall I think that's my biggest hangup with this thing. The original book has a very detailed, realistic look, no? So why then render the film's characters to look like they were ripped from a 1950's UPA cartoon? Additionally, why would you place those very simplistic, stylized characters in a world being overrun with photorealistic food? Anyone else see a slight disconnect?

I appreciate that animation studios are starting to branch out from the novelty of 3D and actually using the tool to push the medium forward, but you can only go so far when you're relying on visuals to support lackluster jokes, acting, and narrative. Now I'm not knocking the source material, but let's not kid ourselves...this ain't sticking too close to the book. We've still got a ways to go before some of these studios really start thinking about legitimate artistic quality. Sure, it looks interesting, but it's just empty calories.